Decarbonising the US Power sector

State level effort not enough to achieve national climate goals

US carbon dioxide emissions will decline by only one-fifth by 2030 unless significant action is taken. This rate is far below the US’ latest pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 52% by 2030, which the country set after rejoining the Paris Agreement. Reductions continue to be led by efforts at the state level, and these are poised to expand further this year, but we are sceptical on whether they will be sufficient to push the US to its stated goals. 


On 22 April, US President Joe Biden announced ambitious country-level climate goals as various countries review and enhance their climate change commitments prior to the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in November, committing to innovation in renewable energy sources and investment in clean energy technology. The targets set out in the nationally determined contribution will align with the Biden administration's goal to decarbonise the US’s electricity sector by 2035.


US Power sector: Reduction estimates


Reductions can seem steeper compared to 2005, which was one of the five highest years of power sector emissions in the past 30 and top two for a total output of greenhouse gases (see Figure 1) . Emissions have remained lower since then, and thus reductions from the 2005 level are not as onerous as those from 1990 (the Kyoto Protocol baseline) or even from more recent years such as 2019. 

Our analysis indicates that the US will reach a 40% reduction in power sector emissions by 2030 and a 21% drop in overall energy-related emissions below the 2005 baseline. We base our reductions forecasts on our proprietary models that track expected continued coal plant retirements, renewables growth and the quickening pace of electric vehicle adoption.


These estimates are below the rates that the US seeks to achieve, causing us to question whether the country can meet the aggressive climate targets it has set out— especially its ambitious target to fully decarbonise the US power grid by 2035.


The current state of affairs 


More than a dozen US states either have implemented or are enacting CO2 limits. The 11 current members of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) have pledged to cut power sector emissions further after already having seen reductions of more than 43% since 2005. 

The possible addition of Pennsylvania, Illinois and North Carolina to RGGI would push the programme to cover more than 38% of US power consumption. However, those states' share of total US emissions is currently below their electricity usage as coal plant retirements over the past decade along with increased renewables penetration have already propelled them into greener territory.


However, New York and California continue to be at the forefront of state-level efforts to reduce emissions. New York adopted one of the country's most aggressive climate bills in 2019 with the signing of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), which calls for a 40% cut in emissions by 2030. Additionally, California extended its initial targets to achieve a 40% reduction from 1990 levels by 2030, which would amount to a 44% drop from 2005 levels.


Our analysis shows that most of the near-term emissions limits will continue to be driven by states in the US Northeast as well as another 10 or so spread throughout the country that have either statutory or executive long-term renewables and carbon-neutrality targets. Reductions by these states alone will be insufficient to meet overall US goals. Given the tight balance of power in the US Congress, implementing more aggressive climate goals may require even more intense policymaking at the state level.

Related insights

June 6, 2025
President Trump’s unexpected “Liberation Day” tariff announcement on 2 April triggered one of the sharpest and most disorderly cross-asset adjustments in recent memory. Equities, Treasuries, and the dollar sold off in tandem, a rare alignment that underscored the market’s confusion around the growth-inflation trade-off. While the headlines caught many off guard, our positioning and macro factor signals were already pointing to vulnerabilities building beneath the surface. Recently released for subscribers, this market insight can help you understand how positioning data provided early warning signals weeks before the market shock. Our detailed report reveals the specific indicators that mattered most and how you can apply these insights to your investment strategy. In this analysis, our EA experts showed how our Quant Analytics framework provided a forward read on where pressure was likely to emerge.
June 5, 2025
Recently released for Energy Aspects subscribers, our analysis reveals a challenging outlook for oil field services companies. Q1 2025 earnings for Baker Hughes, Halliburton, and SLB dropped by a third quarter-on-quarter, to a combined $1.7 billion, the first such decline since Q1 2024.recently released for subscribers, Energy Aspects experts examine the potential downside risks to non-OPEC conventional crude production if Brent averages $60/bbl over 2025-26. Our research reveals a possible 0.3 mb/d reduction to our 2026 forecast, with varying impacts across different regions. While the market has focused primarily on US shale's response to lower prices, conventional fields face significant challenges too. What you'll discover in this analysis: Major OFS companies' earnings trends and industry health outlook for 2025. Contrasting performance between tight oil activity and deepwater operations. Tariff implications for OFS supply chains and equipment manufacturing. Regional market performance across North America, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia. Strategic responses to shareholder expectations during market turbulence.
June 2, 2025
Released last week for Energy Aspects subscribers, our latest Crude Oil analysis examines the complex dynamics affecting Cushing balances and US crude exports through summer 2025. What you'll discover in this analysis: How weak USGC export demand and Midcon light crude strength could alleviate June-August Cushing tightness. Why high Murban availability from OPEC8+ production unwinding is limiting Asian WTI demand. The critical role of Basin pipeline as a swing factor for Cushing balances. How Cushing's ability to secure marginal Midland barrels could cap WTI timespreads upside.